This is a pseudo-mirror of www.bores.com DSP intro at http://www.bores.com/courses/intro/filters/4_pain.htm [sic] as per the policy of this site.
This mirror was created from the source on 03/08/2000 at 22:46 Central Time.
Commercial information, time-dependent information, and all the damn JAVA scripts have been removed.  All "htm" extensions have been changed to the proper "html" extensions.  Has also been edited for coherence, proper-linkage, and better document flow.
Copied without permission.

Introduction to DSP

Filtering

FIR filter design by the window method

FIR filter coefficients can be calculated using the window method:

• pretend we don't mind lots of filter coefficients
• specify the desired frequency response using lots of samples
• calculate the inverse Fourier transform
• this gives us a lot of filter coefficients
• so truncate the filter coefficients to give us less
• apply a window function to sharpen up the filter's frequency response
• then calculate the Fourier transform of the truncated set of coefficients to see if it still matches our requirement

BUT...

Most window functions have a fixed attenuation to the top of their first sidelobe:

No matter how many filter coefficients you throw at it, you cannot improve on a fixed window's attenuation.

This means that the art of FIR filter design by the window method lies in an appropriate choice of window function:

For example, if you need an attenuation of 20 dB or less, then a rectangle window is acceptable. If you need 43 dB you are forced to choose the Hanning window, and so on.

Sadly, the better window functions need more filter coefficients before their shape can be adequately defined. So if you need only 25 dB of attenuation you should choose a triangle window functions which will give you this attenuation: the Hamming window, for example, would give you more attenuation but require more filter coefficients to be adequately defined - and so would be wasteful of computer power.

The art of FIR filter design by the window method lies in choosing the window function which meets your requirement with the minimum number of filter coefficients.

You may notice that if you want an attenuation of 30 dB you are in trouble: the triangle window is not good enough but the Hanning window is too good (and so uses more coefficients than you need). The Kaiser window function is unique in that its shape is variable. A variable parameter defines the shape, so the Kaiser window is unique in being able to match precisely the attenuation you require without overperforming.

| Last updated: 10th January 2000 | http://www.bores.com/courses/intro/filters/4_pain.htm

Telephone: 01483 740138 fax: 01483 740136 email:  Web: http://www.bores.com